patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Tempers Flare as Township Reels from Allegations of Election Fraud

Allegations against the Macomb Township clerk drew heated words from a crowd of residents and township employees at Wednesday's board of trustees meeting.

 

A “vicious political stunt” and “ploy to gain votes for the opposition” were only two of the phrases used by Macomb Township officials Wednesday to describe recent allegations of election fraud made against the township and county clerks. 

Stemming from a lawsuit filed by Macomb Township resident Mark Maiuri on July 19, these allegations call to question the validity of more than 50 signatures on supervisor candidate Janet Dunn's nominating petitions and claim wrongful denial of a Freedom of Information Act request.

For more than an hour, township employees, representatives of the township’s employee unions and residents addressed the board on this controversial issue, arguing both for and against the integrity of the clerk’s office and its ability to supervise the upcoming Aug. 7 primary election.

The lawsuit hinges on two points: that the clerk’s office did knowingly accept invalid signatures on Dunn’s nominating petitions as well as deny a FOIA request for a letter that the lawsuit suggests may support the allegations of fraud.

Maiuri, who was present at Wednesday’s meeting, once again requested the letter's release.

“If there is nothing to hide, then the light of day should support you,” he said. “Or maybe there is something to hide and it's called election fraud. Maybe the letter supports the allegations set forth in the lawsuit against the township. The public has the right and deserves to know that our liberties are not being trampled on.”

Residents request third party to oversee primary

Maiuri’s subsequent request to have a third party oversee the August primary election was supported by supervisor candidate Charles Missig.

“I’ve been going door-to-door for several weeks now and the hot topic as of yesterday and today is the news story that broke about the alleged voter fraud,” Missig said. “I don’t know if there is any credence to it. My only thought is we don’t want to lose the trust of our citizens here and it might be a good idea if we had somebody come in on Aug. 7 and perhaps oversee the election.”

Deputy Clerk Jim Gelios, Elections Supervisor Ed Carey and Records Supervisor Charles Pierce all rose to defend the ability of the clerk office’s to oversee a fair elections process.

“I am here tonight to defend my professional reputation, that of Mr. Koehs and that of our dedicated staff in the elections division,” Carey said. In response to the lawsuit’s claim that a handwriting expert found “extensive fraud” in the signatures on Dunn’s petitions, Carey said, “I find that statement not only utterly preposterous, but personally offensive.”

While Carey admitted finding duplicate signatures, unregistered names and “other deficiencies” on Dunn’s petitions, he said the same issues were noted on the petitions of “just about every candidate” and that those signatures were not counted in the final tally.

Deputy clerk calls out 'Mickey Mouse' signature on Imbronone petition

To illustrate this point, Gelios invited residents questioning the validity of Dunn’s signatures to look at clerk candidate Cathy Imbronone’s petitions, where one individual has signed his or her name as “Mickey Mouse.”

“My staff did not count this signature, nor did we file any lawsuits or accuse anyone of fraud,” Koehs said, referring to the section of Michigan election law which states that by signing a petition, a candidate acknowledges that it is to his or her best knowledge and belief that each signature is “the genuine signature of the person purporting to sign the petition.”   

“I guess she met Mickey Mouse then because Mickey Mouse signed her petition,” Gelios said. “This is a misdemeanor under Michigan law.”

Of having her petitions cited in this lawsuit Dunn said, “This is primarily a political attempt to smear my good name and all of the good work done by this board to allow us to be one of the most financial stable communities in this state.”

That the lawsuit was filed 64 days after the deadline for challenging petition signatures and less than a month before the election date suggests this suit was filed “solely to generate negative publicity toward myself and Ms. Dunn,” Koehs said. “I refuse to have my staff, myself or this Township wrongfully accused by this vicious political stunt.”  

While Supervisor Mark Grabow voiced support for having the county clerk oversee the August primary – if only to "set the record straight" – it is unknown at this time if such action will occur.

Watch this meeting in full, or in part on the township website.

Is this lawsuit a 'vicious political stunt' or a valid question of township transparency? What do you think?

Related Topics: Cathy Imbronone, Freedom Of Information Act, Macomb County Clerk Carmella Sabaugh, Macomb Election Fraud, Macomb Township Clerk Michael Koehs, Mark Maiuri, and election fraud

BJ

8:00 am on Thursday, July 26, 2012

I would like Michael Koehs to explain why a circular promoting him was sent to township residents with the return address of 50842 N. Avenue, Macomb, MI 48042, which address does not exist AND no identifier of who sent this and who paid for this - a huge violation of Michigan Election Laws.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Danielle Closs

9:55 am on Thursday, July 26, 2012

When I google search it it comes up just South of 23 mile on the East side of the road, just past Tina's Country House.....

Comment_arrow

John Johnson

3:17 pm on Sunday, July 29, 2012

(3/5)
The other two candidates Maria Napilitano has a great record of keeping finances together...NOT...lol... can we say over 360,000 in bankruptcy. I hope she watches the townships budgets..... Not to mention her facebook page is available for friend request, I heard girls gone wild was casting on her site.......And what about Renee Micheal's, she trashes our land and decides to run for payback because of previous lawsuits, thats definitely the right reasons..... And last but not least there ring Leader John Johnson, what a great human being, I mean he was a political crook in warren and they let him go and told him not to come back. He lies to people and ruins city's. He can't be in politics himself due to his scandalized past so he finds drunks, and people willing to believe his lies and then runs them for office......What a stand up guy.

Comment_arrow

John Johnson

3:17 pm on Sunday, July 29, 2012

(2/5)
Lets move on to Mark Grabow who only got in office due to a heavy democratic election when Obama won. When in office he only showed up 20 to 30 hours a week. So over 4 yrs we payed him 440,000 plus to have a name tag on his door…. That’s awesome…..lol. The other two candidates Maria Napilitano has a great record of keeping finances together...NOT...lol... can we say over 360,000 in bankruptcy. I hope she watches the townships budgets..... Not to mention her facebook page is available for friend request, I heard girls gone wild was casting on her site....... And what about Renee Micheal's, she trashes our land and decides to run for payback because of previous lawsuits, thats definitely the right reasons.....

Comment_arrow

John Johnson

3:17 pm on Sunday, July 29, 2012

(1/5)
I just truly find it comical that everybody is ripping on the current board, they have saved us money, put us in a surplus and made the township prosper while they where in office. All the posts above are nothing but other candidates having friends write blogs and its childish. To have such statistics posted on a site like this is nothing but opponents of the current board writing to sway the voters. So lets look at hard facts. Kathy is running because she had problems running and starting her business Tina's. She cannot publicly speak, she doesn't know how to vote or hasn't because her voting record is terrible. She sued the township several times, yet lost every time, so I wonder if she is so concerned with the township then why waste there money in court? She probably can't even answer that one. Her sister on the other hand which acts likes she is smart might be, but lets not forget she is drunk 95% of the time, so I will eliminate that idea completely.

Comment_arrow

Jenny Whalen

3:41 pm on Sunday, July 29, 2012

Several comments were deleted for violating Patch's terms of use. These terms can be reviewed here: http://macomb.patch.com/terms

Mike

8:36 am on Thursday, July 26, 2012

Just more proof that it is time to clean house.

Reply

Mary Jo Imbronone

8:45 am on Thursday, July 26, 2012

I would like Mr Koehs to show on Cathy Imbronone's petition where there is a signature of Mickey Mouse, because we reviewed them prior to submitting and again when he came forth and stated there was a signature by Mickey Mouse. If anyone would like the truth, we can provide the petitions. Once again,, Michael Koehs is lying.
The truth is out, and they are very afraid of the truth. Funny thought, he remembered a Mickey Mouse signature on Cathy's petition, but didn't recognize that Sal De Caro, another liar, signed Janet Dunn's petition TWO TIMES. The residents are finally seeing the dishonesty of this board. And by the way, Mr. Koehs, Cathy is not the Chef, I am.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jenny Whalen

9:19 am on Thursday, July 26, 2012

A photo of the petition showing the signature of Mickey Mouse is in this article, one of the three photos above. As for the DiCaro signatures, there are two Salvatore A. DiCaro's in the township - the Parks & Rec director and his 24-year-old son, both who bear the same name and signed Dunn's petition.

Comment_arrow

Danielle Closs

9:49 am on Thursday, July 26, 2012

Mary Jo Imbronone, should get your facts straight. Apparently your checking skills are not very good, or your reading of the article for that matter, because it's blantly obvious there's a Mickey Mouse signature on there. It's not even hidden down the page, it's at #10...and look above at all the NR's, LOTS of invalid signatures on the petition, and that's only in the first 10 listed. 5 of the first 10 are invalid, 50%, really? And exaplin to me again why/how Ms. Imbronone is a good candidate?

Comment_arrow

John Johnson

3:02 pm on Sunday, July 29, 2012

even more of reason not to eat at your place probably drunk doing it....

Comment_arrow

Danielle Closs

8:43 pm on Thursday, August 16, 2012

Besides the fact that you embarassed a band that YOU hired, here's further proof that you're working with a bunch of scum bags and incompetent people....http://macomb.patch.com/articles/macomb-twp-moves-to-refute-election-fraud-allegations-in-court

whatthefrack

9:12 am on Thursday, July 26, 2012

Mr Koehs has more integrity in his little finger than both Mary Jo and her sister Catherine have combined.
There is only one reason Ms Imbronone is running for office and that is to get some sort of retribution for the alleged hardships she and Mary Jo claim to have been put through when they were denied approval for opening their "Tavern" even though they knew that they were not following township ordinances.

Reply

Lisa Nash

11:11 am on Thursday, July 26, 2012

I believe all of the misinformation around the "alleged fraud" was cleared up at last night's Board Meeting. Macomb Township Residents can view the meeting online and see for themselves the motive and agenda behind these false accusations.....64 days past the deadline to challenge a petition and only 28 days before the election. Hear for yourself what the facts are, and go to Facebook.com and search for the "Michael D Koehs" page to read the official statement Mr. Koehs shared at the meeting last night regarding this matter. The spun version of the "truth" is very distorted, and a whole Department of election staff at our Township have unfairly come under fire without facts. Residents, please watch the Board Meetings, ask questions, and make informed decisions with your vote on August 7th. For our Township's sake!! The seriousness and lack of merit of these accusations by the Candidates is sending us down a bad path. Your vote can stop these ill-intended people from making a mockery out of all residents in our community.

Reply

KEN

12:39 pm on Thursday, July 26, 2012

Well I would like to add I am nothing more than a township resident I have NO TIES with either candidates but did have a encounter with MR. Koehls and he did in fact LIE to me after a meeting with him. One thing I cannot stand is someone who LIES. After talking with him I tried 2 more time of calling him up and leaving messages but his response was just to ignore me. Maybe he thought by ignoring me I would just forget and go away well I guess that is NOT THE CASE! See I waited for over 1 year to voice my opinion of MR KOEHLS and now I get the chance. Most people like myself do not get very involved in our goverment or do we know really how it works we just either do not vote at all or vote by a name we might be familiar. I do not know anything about the other candidates BUT i do know something about MR. Koehls and so I will NOT be voting for him!!!!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Lisa Nash

2:06 pm on Thursday, July 26, 2012

Ken, if you have a problem with the weeds in your neighborhood not being kept up i think that was addressed last night as well. There were some Residents at the meeting that expressed your same frustration with the lack of response on multiple inquiries about getting weeds cut by Developers. Mr. Grabow instructed the Residents to contact him, rather than the Clerk, and he would get it taken care of. Just guessing this is what you are referring to becuase the very same thing was brought up last night. I am not sure why Mr. Koehs was unsuccessful with the weed problem, but hopefully Mr. Grabow can take care of it.

Comment_arrow

Danielle Closs

4:33 pm on Thursday, July 26, 2012

If you want to have a good legit argument you should probably spell the man's name right, not a single one in there is....this makes you look like you're uneducated on the issue, which is true so I guess the post is okay.

Comment_arrow

KEN

8:25 pm on Thursday, July 26, 2012

Lisa , wrong about the weeds...... and D. Closs you must really THINK your something I read your rude remarks about myself and the others (attacking someones age are you kidding me?) you remind me of some juvenile that resorts to name calling because that is really all you have to offer.

Kelly

12:39 pm on Thursday, July 26, 2012

Lisa I could not agree more. Each election year has become more and more dirty. It's really a sad state of affairs that people really think that the voters of Macomb Township are really this stupid. Once again Mr. Johnson is trying to get his hands on the tax payer money of Macomb Township. This is no different than the false allegations that Mr. Grabow (lead by Mr. Johnson) in 2008 spouted about Mr. Brennan our prior Supervisor. Allegations again that were in the papers, that once the election was over seemed to disappear. VOTERS, PLEASE BE SMART WITH YOUR VOTES!! Do not fall for this garbage and allow these unqualified candidates get their paws on our tax payer money. Vote Koehs & Dunn and keep Imbronone OUT of townhall and she can take Mr. Grabow with her.

Reply

Frank Cusumano

3:12 pm on Thursday, July 26, 2012

Fact is the only way any of these candidates can distinguish themselves is by making scandalous and scurrilous accusations. In the case of the supposed voter fraud, why wasn't this raised as a challenge within the statutorily prescribed period? I think it is a real shame that candidates, including incumbents, need subject themselves and their families to such abuse. Stick to the issues. After watching the candidates on cable, I am voting for KOEHS, BUCCI, KRZEMINSKI, and NEVERS. I have nothing bad to say about Grabow or Dunn or Goodhue, and as Boards go, Macomb Township has not been that bad. I do want Macomb Township to be civil and businesslike, and not like SHELBY which is a three ringed circus. Thankfully, after the primary, the citizenry will slide back into apathy and the few who regularly attend the Township Board meetings can get back to the business of making our public comments on issues that matter: water rate increases from Detroit, contiguous sidewalks so the children don't get killed, school crossing guards, street light retrofits to save subdivisions with lighting money, to name a few issues.

Reply

Frank Cusumano

3:43 pm on Thursday, July 26, 2012

One last issue, I want no more surpluses. If there is a surplus, it should be returned to the citizens who are, by definition, over taxed if there is a surplus.

Reply

Lisa Nash

4:01 pm on Thursday, July 26, 2012

And Frank, because this lawsuit is made against the Clerk in his official capacity, Macomb Township taxpayers will have to foot the bill for legal council to defend him, correct?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Frank Cusumano

3:00 pm on Wednesday, August 1, 2012

I think it is a throw away lawsuit that will be dismissed after the primary. Here is the link to my scribd.com account to the print out from the County Clerk's Office. Take a look. Not much activity huh? Seems to me that if this litigant was serious he would be asking for a TRO and Preliminary Injunction. I have not read the lawsuit, but I would bet $1 (not $10,000 like Romney casually does during the GOP debates) that it is just a big splash with little or no substance under the election laws.
http://www.scribd.com/doc/101767658

Mary Jo Imbronone

5:08 pm on Thursday, July 26, 2012

Danielle, please review Janet dunn's supervisor sigs The double sigs were not crossed off. Yes I overlooked the mickey mouse signature, but I am not trained or paid to do so. No it is not about revenge, it's time for change. Johnson is a political consultant, just like Dick Saubaugh who was retained by micheal koehs. That's politics. Yes. It gets nasty. The vision of the new candidates are clear. Seek out business, create jobs, make people want to live by their jobs. Commercial tax revenue is much larger than residential. More business, more business taxes, more money for twp. With that revenue means more amenities for residents. Actively seek business example is m59 south side partridge creek, walmart, lakeside, the south side of macomb on m59 is vacant. Let's get a city planner with vision and growth. I don't have children, but don't you want to see a better macomb for your kids and grandchildren? It's time for some young, aggressive candidates to bring macomb back. Yes. It's a great place to live, it can be better. Government has to be run like business. Bottom line is dollars. Let's get developers back, small businesses and generate a huge tax revenue It can happen, but not with this current board. They have become complacent. Why go to Clinton, shelby or Rochester? Keep our dollars here. For our residents. We are not bad people, we have worked hard many years and built thriving businesses. Help us take macomb to a new level. It's just common sense..

Reply
Comment_arrow

Danielle Closs

5:21 pm on Thursday, July 26, 2012

you don't have to be trained to see Mickey Mouse! Really?

"It's time for some young, aggressive candidates..." Saw Ms. Imbronone's ads on the road today, she is not young, young is <40. And it's apparent she's aggressive, by making the false accusations, makes no one want to vote for that. Who wants to vote for someone who can't even get her facts straight before starting a smear campaign? You guys had so much time to "investigate" Dunn's signatures, you should have spent more time checking your own making sure they were good, 50% invalid is TERRIBLE collection!

Kyle H

6:45 pm on Thursday, July 26, 2012

It is pretty horrendous the way that mr Koehs treated mr grabow last night. If there were duplicate signatures why not cross them off. And why won't he just release this letter. What is he hiding ?

Reply

Bethany

9:49 pm on Thursday, July 26, 2012

Koehs seems to be a bit sketchy, but he sure has some snazzy shirts.

Reply

Mary Jo Imbronone

10:10 pm on Thursday, July 26, 2012

Danielle if that is not an alias. The truth is one. This board needs to go. The residents know it. They are very smart . We don't smear we speak the truth and the voters know it .

Reply
Comment_arrow

Danielle Closs

6:19 pm on Friday, July 27, 2012

http://www.candgnews.com/news/chamber-commerce-calls-dunn-more-qualified-supervisor-grabow

An independent analysis of the candidates qualifications...Imbronone has the second LOWEST that can be given out and Michael has THE highest. Hmmm, decisions decisions, NOT!

Tom Tocco

11:49 pm on Thursday, July 26, 2012

The whole mudslinging in politics is funny. Freedom of speech is one thing, but come on. Anyone that knows Cathy knows she has integrity. As a voter you not only have the right to do your home work, but owe it to the other residents. People are afraid of change, but it is necessary. Look at Detroit people were comfortable with Young, but more worried about change. He was there a long time. Hmmmm.

I don't know Koehs so I cannot say anything about him. Ask yourself before August 7th if you want someone that represents you the people. I know I would be proud to have Cathy Imbronone represent this township.

Reply

whatthefrack

9:02 am on Friday, July 27, 2012

Why hasn't Imbronone filed any campaign contributions statements with the county? Is she afraid everyone will see who is REALLY backing her and who is paying for those hundreds of signs littering the township?

Anyone remember the multiple lawsuits that she and her sister brought upon the township? The ones where they refused to obey regulations and ordinances while trying to open their tavern? How much did that cost the township?

How can someone with no experience in government even think that they are capable of succeeding in such a high position as township clerk? I shudder at the thought.

Reply

Nancy

9:44 am on Friday, July 27, 2012

whaththefrack, what'd just get to work at the township offices? Go do your work instead of wasting your time with your false statements

Reply
Comment_arrow

Danielle Closs

6:20 pm on Friday, July 27, 2012

none, don't worry about her :)

Shannon

10:57 pm on Friday, July 27, 2012

“Our evaluation process is truly bi-partisan,” said Grace Shore, CEO of the county chamber. “This process is not about party affiliation. Our committee looks for individuals with the skill set and innovation to move our state and county forward.”

That's a very true and accurate statement...considering that all the candidates are running as Republicans. Nice work, Chamber, for thinking outside the box and not rattling any cages. Keep sticking in the pockets of our current board. "Shocking" that Koehs is the only "preferred" candidate. I hope my fellow residents can read past this continued nonsense and will make educated and thought-out election decisions, based on fact and for candidates who exemply high integrity through their historic actions.

Reply

Billy Shears

8:55 am on Saturday, July 28, 2012

It's amazing what a kind and generous guy John Johnson is. He paid for a hand writing expert. He is clearly the puppetmaster of at least four candidates. He has put out press releases and mailings smearing Dunn and Koehs, that his candidate Missig admitted he did not see. Yet, he only appears in one candidates( Missig) campaign finance report. Not John or his son, Little Johnson, appear in Cathy Imbronone's report. Must be getting a lot of free food and drink at the Tavern. As far as the Chef's hat goes Ms Imbronone, you have a very short memory. It didn't seem to bother you when Brennan was crowned king. I read the piece and I agree with you, the residents are smart.The piece was not only entertaining, but all points on each candidate were all proven facts, look it up. I'm sure the voters will figure out the truth.

Reply

Lisa Nash

9:08 am on Saturday, July 28, 2012

Well said Billy! I got a chuckle out of Shannon's response this morning, especially the last sentence about "high integrity" and "historical actions". When I started taking a look at the candidates all I had to do was Google the names Grabow, Imbronone, and Michal to see all the lawsuits against the Township. And the allegations now about the Chamber of Commerce? So our Township Election Department and the County Chamber of Commerce are corrupt? What's next, the County Executive's Office?

Reply

Shannon

9:53 am on Saturday, July 28, 2012

On the continuing issue of integrity, judge a person by who supports them. Take a look at the County Clerk's Election Department website (http://campaignfinance.macombcountymi.gov/).

For contributions to Mr. Koehs: 1 of 13 contributors are Township residents, the rest are vendors to the Township. For Mrs. Goodhue, our Treasurer: the three banks that the Township deals with are her contributors, Huntington, Comerica and Flagstar (via their PACs). The winner is Mr. Bucci: $17,475 in contributions, with the majority from individuals associated with engineering firms that are paid to review Township projects (Spalding Dedecker, Giffels and our Township staff engineer.)
Makes me wonder if the "status quo" in Macomb is similar to the "status quo" by Mr. Ficano's Wayne County? Is this "business friendly," as referenced by Ms. Shore of the Chamber, keeping friends in position to continue to do work for the Township and receive contributions from them?

Reply

Billy Shears

11:14 am on Saturday, July 28, 2012

Shannon, Mr. Ficano really? FYI 42 of the 66 contributions to Ms. Imbronone are from non residents. One third of Mr.Christ's money came from Matty Moroun, and Mr. Grabow wasn't even smart enough to file on time, so there's nothing view. Three of the candidates have sued the Twp. numerous times and clearly have an ax to grind. This is who you want running our Twp. If Grabow and Imbronone get in, then it's welcome to Detroit North. Macomb Twp. will be up for sale. All business will have to go through John Johnson, and everyone knows how ethical he is.

Reply

Steven

1:34 pm on Monday, July 30, 2012

I was at Tinas Tavern on saturday July 28. The owners had hired a band. Whil the band played outside we ate dinner inside. Mary Jo made many rude comments about the band she hired. Loudly, and to anyone who would listen. The bands cime? They played rock and roll instead of motown. The band was told to turn it down, and play motown many times. The band turned it down, but didnt know any motown. They made the best of it till Mary finally literally pulled the plug on them in the middle of a song. I felt bad for the band, who were only doing what they were hired to do. If she does the same amount of homework in a political position as she does at her bar, if she plans on treating the citizens nearly as bad as the people she hired to play at her bar, the people of macomb township should do themselves a favor, and vote in mickey mouse instead.

Reply

Milano

1:58 pm on Monday, July 30, 2012

I was there Saturday as well and could not believe that MJ actually Schiavo'd the band in the middle of a song!

Milano

Reply

Frank Cusumano

3:10 pm on Wednesday, August 1, 2012

"Schiavo'd?" Here is a lyric the band can play, "Take this job and Schiavo it, I ain't working at Tina's tavern no more...."

Reply

Lisa Nash

11:38 pm on Wednesday, August 1, 2012

So who witnessed the fraud taking place? And who allegedly demonstrated fraudulent actions? Now I am really confused???

http://www.candgnews.com/news/recording-contradicts-election-fraud-lawsuit

Reply

Kristin

3:42 pm on Saturday, August 4, 2012

MJ - Is it true that if I vote for Cathy I get free food and drink at Tina's??

Lucky for me I am an active Republican in the community and had the pleasure of being able to hear you offer that same treat to others who were in attendance at the Macomb Twp Republicans Q&A held at CMPL or I would have missed out on that great deal!

Reply

Leave a comment