Candice Miller Critical of Obama's Proposed Gun Laws

Congresswoman says the proposals are "an overreach of executive authority" and "inadequate in addressing the root cause" of tragedies such as Newtown.

U.S. Rep. Candice Miller, R-MI 10, criticized plans announced Wednesday by President Barack Obama indicating strict gun control measures.

“The murder of innocent children in Newtown, Connecticut was a heinous act that demands action to better protect our children," Miller wrote in a statement Wednesday. "It is unfortunate that the Obama administration is focusing far too much on the method used instead of the root cause of why it happened. The vast majority of firearm owners in America are law abiding citizens simply exercising the right of self defense for themselves and their families guaranteed by the Second Amendment of our Constitution."

According to the White House fact sheet, Obama’s plan includes:

  • Reinstating and strengthening the assault weapons ban.
  • Restoring a 10-round limit on ammunition magazines.
  • Getting rid of armor-piercing bullets.
  • Ending a freeze on research into gun violence.
  • Providing additional tools to prevent and prosecute gun crime.
  • Calling on Congress to pass a $4 billion proposal to help communities keep 15,000 police officers on the streets, as well as new gun trafficking legislation that would “impose serious penalties on those who help get guns into the hands of criminals."
  • Making schools safer by giving communities the opportunity to hire up to 1,000 school resource officers and school counselors.

Miller also was critical of the White House's role in drafting these gun law measures.

“The Obama Administration’s proposal is largely focused on diminishing the Second Amendment rights of law abiding owners of firearms with new laws which the President himself has stated would have done nothing to stop the attack on Newtown. I cannot support that effort. It is disappointing that President Obama’s political supporters in Hollywood who peddle violence and death to our children through violent video games and movies have been given a pass in this process. It is also disappointing that the President has not put forward a plan to take decisive action in improving a mental health system that has allowed these types of potential killers to fall through the cracks, only to allow them to carry out violent attacks. On one hand, this proposal is an overreach of executive authority and on the other, it is inadequate in addressing the root cause of the attacks."

The representative further stated her belief that the proposed measures would not limit the ability of criminals to obtain firearms but rather prevent law-abiding citizens from exercising their Constitutional right. 

“Criminals, by their very definition, do not care what the law states, so the only people impacted by stricter gun laws are those who seek to obey the law, not violent criminals. The fact of the matter is that there are already numerous laws in this nation protecting against the unlawful use of firearms that are simply not enforced. If the Obama administration and states across the country want to reduce the criminal use of firearms it is time to start prosecuting those violations to the full extent of the law and take the guns out of the hands of criminals by putting them behind bars."

Miller, who has an A-rating from the National Rifle Association, maintains that the root of gun violence is "an inadequate mental health system."

"And if we truly want to stop instances like Newtown, we must look into all of the issues that may have contributed to the problem and can serve as real solutions to future violence. The issue of an inadequate mental health system in this country that has failed to identify those who may commit these types of heinous acts before they happen and treat them effectively. The President has suggested some small steps in this direction, however more has to be done. The issue of violent video games and movies that desensitize our children toward violence and death. Nothing we do will stop those disposed to violence if we do not attack the root causes of these tragedies."

Frustrated Old Man January 19, 2013 at 02:52 PM
It's obvious you haven't leaned that an AR15 semi-automatic rifle is not an assault rifle. Forget about hunting, what about protecting your home and family? Why should the general public be denied the same ability to defend themselves, as law enforcement? They can request back up. We might be left to fight on our own! We're going up against the same kind of ruthless criminals. There have been numerous instances where a large group has shown up at a persons home, invaded it, or did a drive by, killing an several people. Why should I be restricted to a small handgun, if something more effective is available? One more thing John P. Who are you to decide what's right for the rest of us? Maybe we should look into your life, and decide what you don't need.
John P January 19, 2013 at 03:20 PM
Look frustrated I gave my opinion about what I think you gave yours I know about an AR15. I think the problem is if you are protecting your family this gun is not sufficient. You should get a couple of machine guns, some grenades, a few rocket launchers and some tear gas. One never knows when you will need this. I guess the families who lost all their love ones because a sick person was able to get a hold of this gun should understand your needs.
dkz January 23, 2013 at 04:37 PM
Hey John you are a perfect example on how we just cant fix stupid. Until then just shut up or better yet move to New York. You will fit in there.
Ron January 23, 2013 at 04:45 PM
Hey John, If you dont like it move to 1 of many other countries that ban all guns and stay out of mine, the AR-15 was not the reason those kids were killed you fool!! IF you wont take responsibility to defend youself or your family and you choose to believe that laws, police and politics will provide all the protection YOUR family DESERVES then thats your choice, do not try to force your beliefs on me or anyone else for that matter..
John P January 23, 2013 at 08:46 PM
DKZ, Ron, Getting nasty solves nothing, everyone has a right to their opinion my happens to be against yours. From the sounds of your comments you must be Tea Party because they can not have debate with out getting nasty. I have a right to live in this country whatever I believe your opinions means nothing to me but you can spew all the hate mongering all you want. I chose to take the high road you could always take your own advice and move out of the country if you do not like the laws in the future.


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »